considered home design Archives - Everyday Software, Everyday Joyhttps://business-service.2software.net/tag/considered-home-design/Software That Makes Life FunThu, 06 Aug 2026 16:01:15 +0000en-UShourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3Remodelista Considered Design Awards Launch June 1https://business-service.2software.net/remodelista-considered-design-awards-launch-june-1/https://business-service.2software.net/remodelista-considered-design-awards-launch-june-1/#respondThu, 06 Aug 2026 16:01:15 +0000https://business-service.2software.net/?p=24281The Remodelista Considered Design Awards opened on June 1, 2018, inviting professional designers, homeowners, renters, and DIY renovators to share thoughtful kitchens, baths, living spaces, gardens, and organization projects. This in-depth retrospective examines the contest timeline, categories, judges, prizes, submission requirements, past winning ideas, and practical lessons for presenting a design project. It also explores why considered design remains relevant: the strongest homes are not defined by price or passing trends, but by useful layouts, durable materials, personal character, and solutions that make daily life easier.

The post Remodelista Considered Design Awards Launch June 1 appeared first on Everyday Software, Everyday Joy.

]]>
.ap-toc{border:1px solid #e5e5e5;border-radius:8px;margin:14px 0;}.ap-toc summary{cursor:pointer;padding:12px;font-weight:700;list-style:none;}.ap-toc summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-body{padding:0 12px 12px 12px;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-toggle{font-weight:400;font-size:90%;opacity:.8;margin-left:6px;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-hide{display:none;}.ap-toc[open] .ap-toc-show{display:none;}.ap-toc[open] .ap-toc-hide{display:inline;}
Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide

The Remodelista Considered Design Awards returned on June 1, 2018, with an invitation that was refreshingly democratic: professionals, homeowners, renters, contractors, and fearless DIY renovators could all share spaces they believed represented thoughtful design. No velvet rope, architecture degree, or collection of tiny black turtlenecks was required.

Announced in advance on May 22, the fifth annual competition opened submissions from June 1 through June 22. It recognized kitchens, bathrooms, living and dining spaces, gardens, landscapes, and organization projects that combined beauty with genuine usefulness. Rather than treating good design as a parade of expensive objects, the awards celebrated rooms that solved problems, respected their surroundings, and made everyday life more enjoyable.

Although the submission window belongs to design history now, the launch remains worth revisiting. It demonstrates how an editorial design competition can uncover original ideas beyond the usual showrooms, celebrity homes, and professionally styled mansions. Sometimes the most considered room belongs to an architect. Sometimes it belongs to a renter who made an awkward corner useful with plywood, patience, and a heroic number of wall anchors.

What Were the Remodelista Considered Design Awards?

The Remodelista Considered Design Awards were created to recognize exceptional home design from both industry professionals and ordinary readers. The competition began in 2013 and developed into an annual showcase of renovations, interiors, gardens, and practical design solutions.

The word “considered” was central to the awards’ identity. A considered home is not merely photogenic. It reflects deliberate decisions about layout, materials, storage, light, comfort, craftsmanship, and the way people actually live. A marble counter may look wonderful, but it becomes more meaningful when it improves workflow, ages gracefully, and survives an encounter with lemon juice.

The competition also challenged the idea that excellent residential design must fit one visual style. Past entries included historic renovations, compact apartments, contemporary additions, rustic kitchens, highly organized utility spaces, and rooms that mixed modern elements with inherited or vintage pieces.

A Competition for Professionals and Amateurs

One of the program’s strongest features was its separation of amateur and professional categories. Homeowners and renters did not have to compete directly against architecture firms with professional photographers, drafting teams, and an alarming ability to hide electrical outlets.

At the same time, the professional divisions gave architects and interior designers an opportunity to explain the reasoning behind polished projects. This structure made the awards useful to a broad audience. Readers could admire sophisticated professional work while also discovering achievable ideas from people who designed and renovated their own homes.

Why the June 1 Launch Mattered

The June 1 launch officially opened a three-week submission period ending at midnight Pacific Time on June 22, 2018. Eligible participants in the United States and Canada, excluding Quebec, could submit completed projects in the appropriate categories.

The timing gave participants a manageable but meaningful deadline. Three weeks was long enough to select photographs, prepare captions, and write a project description, yet short enough to discourage the classic renovation habit of saying, “We will photograph it after we replace that one cabinet handle,” for six consecutive months.

The 2018 competition was described as the fifth annual Considered Design Awards. Its format combined editorial selection with community involvement: guest judges chose finalists, and readers later voted for the winners. This balance helped preserve professional credibility while giving the Remodelista and Gardenista audiences an active role in the outcome.

The Complete 2018 Timeline

  • May 22: Remodelista previewed the return of the awards.
  • June 1: Submissions officially opened.
  • June 22: The submission period closed at midnight Pacific Time.
  • July 9: Finalists were scheduled to be announced.
  • July 9 through August 3: Readers could vote for their favorite projects.
  • August 6: Winning projects were scheduled to be announced.

Remodelista Considered Design Awards Categories

The interior awards focused on the rooms where daily life tends to leave the most fingerprints. Professional and amateur entrants competed separately in three principal categories:

  • Best Kitchen
  • Best Bath
  • Best Living and/or Dining Room

These categories were broad enough to welcome projects with very different budgets, architectural styles, and design challenges. A dramatic full-scale renovation could appear alongside a carefully edited room transformed through paint, restored materials, better storage, and a smarter arrangement of furniture.

The New Kitchen Organization Category

The major addition in 2018 was Best Kitchen Organization Project, presented in connection with The Organized Home. Unlike the main room categories, it was open to both professionals and amateurs.

This category acknowledged an important design truth: organization is not separate from aesthetics. A kitchen can have handcrafted cabinets and a beautiful range, but if opening the pantry causes three baking sheets to attack your ankles, the design conversation is not finished.

Entrants could highlight purposeful storage ideas, efficient cabinet interiors, orderly pantries, accessible shelves, labeled containers, drawer systems, or other solutions that improved how a kitchen functioned. The addition broadened the definition of award-worthy design by recognizing systems rather than surfaces alone.

Gardenista’s Outdoor Categories

Remodelista’s sister publication, Gardenista, ran related outdoor awards. Its categories included gardens, professional landscapes, outdoor living spaces, hardscape, curb appeal, and edible gardens.

Together, the two competitions treated a home and its surroundings as a connected design environment. A successful interior might frame a view of the garden, while a thoughtful landscape could extend dining, entertaining, and daily living beyond the walls.

Who Judged the 2018 Awards?

The guest judges brought experience from architecture, interiors, fashion, landscape design, textiles, and home organization. Remodelista’s interior finalists were evaluated by Stephen Alesch, co-founder of Roman and Williams, and fashion and lifestyle designer Jenni Kayne.

Landscape designer Brook Klausing and designer Erica Tanov participated on the Gardenista side, while Blisshaus founder Wiebke Liu judged the kitchen organization category.

The mix of disciplines was significant. Residential design is rarely only about architecture. A room’s success may depend on color, texture, furniture placement, storage habits, natural light, landscaping, and the emotional atmosphere created by all those elements working together.

After the judges selected finalists, readers voted for their favorites. Public voting gave strong visual communication an additional role. Entrants needed projects that worked in real life, but they also needed photographs and descriptions that helped online viewers understand why those projects worked.

Prizes and Professional Recognition

Each category winner was offered a $500 Schoolhouse gift card, redeemable online or through the company’s stores. Winning projects also received full editorial profiles on Remodelista, Gardenista, or The Organized Home.

For many participants, the editorial feature may have been more valuable than the merchandise prize. A detailed project profile could introduce an architect, designer, or homeowner to a large design-conscious audience. It could also preserve the story behind a renovation rather than reducing the project to a single attractive photograph.

Professional winners received automatic entry into Remodelista’s Architect/Designer Directory. That benefit gave firms a path toward continuing exposure among readers actively searching for renovation and design professionals.

What Entrants Were Asked to Submit

Participants could submit multiple qualifying projects. Each entry could include as many as 10 photographs, with images measuring at least 1,000 pixels wide. Entrants were also expected to provide a concise project description and individual captions.

Projects previously featured on Remodelista were excluded, helping the contest surface new work. The rules encouraged participants to show enough of a room to communicate its layout, materials, details, and relationship to the rest of the home.

Photography Needed to Explain the Design

A strong design-award photograph does more than make a room look expensive. It explains the project. Wide views establish the layout, while detail photographs reveal craftsmanship, hardware, storage, transitions, and material choices.

A useful image sequence might begin with the overall room, move through important functional zones, and finish with the details that give the project character. For a kitchen, that could mean showing the relationship among the sink, range, island, dining area, and storage. Ten nearly identical photographs of a faucet, however handsome, are unlikely to tell the full story.

Natural-looking light, clean compositions, straight vertical lines, and realistic color help viewers understand a space. Styling should support the design rather than overwhelm it. A bowl of lemons can be charming. Forty-seven artfully scattered lemons may suggest the kitchen has been taken hostage by citrus.

The Description Needed a Clear Narrative

The most effective project descriptions usually follow a simple structure:

  1. Explain the original problem.
  2. Describe the design goal.
  3. Identify the most important decisions.
  4. Show how those decisions improved daily life.

Specific details are more persuasive than decorative language. Instead of saying a renovation produced “a breathtaking modern oasis,” an entrant could explain that removing a wall brought daylight into the center of the house, created a direct path to the garden, and allowed the family to cook while supervising young children.

What Past Winners Reveal About Considered Design

The award winners were not united by one trend, color palette, or luxury price point. They were united by clarity of intention.

The 2018 Best Professional Kitchen winner, the Montlake Residence in Seattle by Mowery Marsh Architects and Kaylen Flugel Design, transformed a compartmentalized midcentury house by opening the upper level, introducing a smaller mezzanine, and reconnecting the interior with surrounding trees. Warm wood, black cabinetry, marble, concrete, and brass balanced drama with comfort.

The project demonstrates why design awards often respond to stories of transformation. The winning idea was not simply “install black cabinets.” It was the way spatial editing, daylight, views, restored details, and carefully tested finishes worked together.

Amateur winners similarly proved that thoughtful design is not limited to professional studios. Earlier recognized projects included a black-and-white Toronto kitchen that blended rustic and refined elements, a living and dining space on an organic Hawaiian farm, and carefully remodeled bungalow bathrooms.

These spaces had recognizable personalities because they responded to their owners, buildings, and locations. They did not appear to have been ordered as complete matching sets from a showroom labeled “Tasteful Person, Package B.”

Why the Awards Still Matter to Homeowners

Design competitions can serve as public libraries of problem-solving. Even readers who never entered the Remodelista Considered Design Awards could browse submissions and study hundreds of approaches to kitchens, baths, living rooms, landscapes, and storage.

A homeowner planning a renovation might compare ways to handle a narrow kitchen, preserve original architecture, incorporate modern appliances, organize open shelving, or make a compact bathroom feel calmer. Because the competition included amateur work, the archive offered examples that felt approachable as well as aspirational.

Good Design Became More Inclusive

Opening categories to renters, DIYers, homeowners, contractors, architects, and interior designers expanded the meaning of design authority. Expertise still mattered, but it was not defined exclusively by a professional title.

Someone who has lived in a difficult room for years may understand its problems with extraordinary precision. A renter may develop an ingenious reversible storage system. A homeowner restoring an old house may learn more about its original millwork than anyone expected, including several relatives who now regret asking casual questions at dinner.

Function Received Equal Billing

The inclusion of kitchen organization made the awards especially relevant to everyday life. It suggested that a design solution could be worthy of recognition because it reduced clutter, simplified cooking, or made frequently used tools easier to reach.

That emphasis remains useful today. Sustainable and long-lasting interiors are often created not by constant replacement but by selecting durable materials, preserving useful existing features, and arranging possessions so the home can function without requiring a daily wrestling match.

Experience-Based Lessons From Preparing a Design Award Entry

The experience of preparing a design award submission often changes how people see their own homes. A room that once felt “finished enough” suddenly becomes a collection of decisions that need to be explained. Why was the doorway moved? Why was the original floor preserved? Why does one cabinet stop six inches before the ceiling? Sometimes there is a brilliant reason. Sometimes the contractor had to leave early on Friday.

The first practical lesson is to document the project before, during, and after construction. Before photographs establish the challenge. Progress images reveal hidden work, such as repaired framing, relocated plumbing, or restored brick. Final photographs show the result, but the earlier images prove that the transformation involved more than attractive cushions.

Participants also learn that living in a room can improve the submission story. After several weeks of use, the homeowner may discover that the new island has become a homework station, breakfast counter, serving surface, and unofficial place where everyone leaves their keys. These observations demonstrate how a design performs beyond the photo shoot.

Another common experience is the struggle to edit. When entrants are allowed up to 10 images, the temptation is to submit every photograph that contains a beloved tile. Strong entries are usually more disciplined. Each image should contribute new information: the overall plan, a key view, an important transition, a storage solution, a material detail, or evidence of how people use the space.

Writing the description can be equally revealing. Owners frequently begin with style labels such as modern farmhouse, Scandinavian, traditional, or industrial. Yet the more interesting story often concerns constraints. A low ceiling required careful lighting. A limited budget encouraged the reuse of cabinets. A historic structure demanded custom solutions. A small footprint led to furniture that performs two jobs without looking like gym equipment.

The process also teaches entrants to separate genuine design choices from decoration added for photographs. Fresh flowers and neatly folded towels may improve an image, but judges and readers still look for spatial logic, proportion, material harmony, and practical value. Styling is the punctuation, not the entire sentence.

Collaboration becomes more visible as well. A seemingly simple room may involve homeowners, architects, interior designers, builders, cabinetmakers, electricians, landscape designers, photographers, and patient friends asked to move the same chair nine times. Crediting those contributors is both ethical and useful because it explains how the project came together.

Finally, submitting a project requires accepting that thoughtful work may not win. Public voting, jury preferences, photography quality, and the strength of competing entries all affect the outcome. The worthwhile part is learning to articulate what the project accomplished. A clear record of the renovation can support a professional portfolio, preserve the history of a home, or simply remind the owners why months of dust, decisions, and mysteriously delayed faucets were worth enduring.

How to Apply the Considered Design Approach Today

The 2018 entry period has long since closed, but the principles behind the Remodelista Considered Design Awards remain practical. Before changing a room, begin with the problem rather than the shopping list. Observe where clutter forms, how people move, when daylight enters, which materials are aging well, and which features deserve preservation.

Then make choices that support a coherent purpose. A considered kitchen may prioritize cooking efficiency, family gathering, historic character, accessibility, or compact storage. It does not need to satisfy every trend currently sprinting across social media.

Document the process, test samples in the actual room, and allow the space to develop a personality connected to its occupants. The goal is not to produce a home that looks untouched. It is to create one that works so well that living in it feels natural.

Conclusion

The Remodelista Considered Design Awards launch on June 1, 2018, was more than a call for beautiful room photographs. It invited professionals and amateurs to explain how thoughtful design could improve a kitchen, bathroom, living space, garden, or storage system.

With separate categories, respected guest judges, public voting, editorial recognition, and an accessible submission process, the competition made home design feel both aspirational and participatory. Its most lasting lesson is straightforward: the best spaces are not merely decorated. They are observed, tested, edited, and designed around real life.

The post Remodelista Considered Design Awards Launch June 1 appeared first on Everyday Software, Everyday Joy.

]]>
https://business-service.2software.net/remodelista-considered-design-awards-launch-june-1/feed/0
2017 Awards Judge: Rita Konighttps://business-service.2software.net/2017-awards-judge-rita-konig/https://business-service.2software.net/2017-awards-judge-rita-konig/#respondThu, 26 Feb 2026 12:02:16 +0000https://business-service.2software.net/?p=8333Rita Konig served as a guest judge for the 2017 Remodelista + Gardenista Considered Design Awardsan annual contest celebrating the smartest, most thoughtful home and garden projects. This deep dive unpacks what her judging role involved, why her design worldview fits the ‘Considered’ ethos, and what she tends to value: strong layouts, visible comfort, personal layers, and timeless character (often helped along by vintage finds). You’ll also get practical, submission-ready tips for telling your project story with clarityhighlighting constraints, solutions, and real-life functionalityplus an inside look at the very relatable ‘awards season’ experience of editing photos, writing descriptions, and learning what you truly value in a space. If you want your home to feel both beautiful and livable, borrow a page from Rita’s judging lens.

The post 2017 Awards Judge: Rita Konig appeared first on Everyday Software, Everyday Joy.

]]>
.ap-toc{border:1px solid #e5e5e5;border-radius:8px;margin:14px 0;}.ap-toc summary{cursor:pointer;padding:12px;font-weight:700;list-style:none;}.ap-toc summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-body{padding:0 12px 12px 12px;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-toggle{font-weight:400;font-size:90%;opacity:.8;margin-left:6px;}.ap-toc .ap-toc-hide{display:none;}.ap-toc[open] .ap-toc-show{display:none;}.ap-toc[open] .ap-toc-hide{display:inline;}
Table of Contents >> Show >> Hide

If you’ve ever stared at a “before” photo and thought, this room is fine… I guess… and then seen the “after” and immediately wanted to
move in, you already understand the basic job description of a great decorator: turning “fine” into “how did they do that?” Rita Konig is one of
those decoratorsand in the 2017 Remodelista + Gardenista Considered Design Awards, she was also one of the people tasked with
deciding which projects deserved finalist glory.

This article breaks down what “2017 Awards Judge” actually meant in practice, who Rita Konig is (beyond “has better lamps than the rest of us”),
and how her design point of view can help you spot (or create) award-worthy workwhether you’re remodeling a bathroom, rethinking a kitchen, or
making your curb appeal say “welcome” instead of “we tried.”

What “2017 Awards Judge” Meant (and What It Didn’t)

The Considered Design Awards weren’t a velvet-rope industry gala where everyone pretends to love canapé spoons. They were a structured, public-facing
design contest run by Remodelista (home interiors) and Gardenista (outdoor spaces). People submitted real projectsamateur and professionalacross
a wide range of categories, then editors and guest judges selected finalists, and readers voted on winners in most categories.

In other words: being a 2017 Awards Judge meant looking at hundreds (thousands) of project photos and descriptions, comparing wildly
different budgets and constraints, and still being able to say, “Yes, this is the one that nailed it.” It’s less “Judge Judy,” more
“design detective with a deadline.”

Meet Rita Konig: Designer, Writer, Professional Human With Opinions About Walls

Rita Konig is a London-based interior designer and design writer whose career has spanned both the UK and the US. She’s designed homes on both sides
of the Atlantic, and her background in editorial work shows up in how she communicates about design: clear, specific, and refreshingly honest.

Remodelista’s own introduction to her as a 2017 guest judge highlights the “two-hats” credibility that makes her perfect for awards judging:
she’s actively designing projects, and she also knows how to explain why they workwithout hiding behind vague phrases like “a dialogue between
texture and soul.” (Although, to be fair, texture does deserve rights.)

Her design personality can be summarized as: comfortable, layered, personal, and practical. Not “museum house,” not “trend cosplay.”
The rooms are meant to be lived inby actual humans with actual habits, like sitting down, eating dinner, and occasionally leaving a book open
because the chapter ended on a rude cliffhanger.

Why She Makes Sense as a 2017 Considered Design Awards Judge

Design awards judging gets messy fast because projects aren’t judged in a vacuum. A tiny rental kitchen refresh might be more impressive than a giant
new build if it solves harder constraints and does more with less. Rita Konig’s approach to designstarting with how a room will be usedhelps
level that playing field.

She’s repeatedly described her process as a kind of “detective work”: understanding who lives there, how they live, and how they want to feel in
the space. That mindset is exactly what the “Considered” ethos is about: thoughtful choices, not random shopping.

The Rita Konig Judging Lens: What Tends to Win Her Over

Judges don’t publish a literal scorecard, but Rita’s public advice and design philosophy give you strong clues about what she values when looking at
a project submission.

1) A layout that’s smarter than the room’s original plan

A beautiful room that functions badly is basically a sports car with no steering wheel. Rita emphasizes starting with plans and layoutsfiguring out
flow, scale, and how people will actually move and live in the space before getting hypnotized by fabric samples.

In awards terms, this often shows up as: “We fixed the circulation,” “We made seating make sense,” “We stopped ignoring the window just because the
fireplace was being dramatic,” or “We finally made the dining area work for real meals, not just fantasy dinner parties.”

2) Comfort you can feel through the screen

Her rooms aim for a lived-in easedeep seating, good cushions, the sense that someone can actually relax there. This doesn’t mean sloppy; it means
human. Submissions that show comfort, warmth, and real-life usability tend to align with her worldview.

3) Vintage and personality (not “everything from the same showroom”)

Rita is a consistent advocate for vintage and antiquesnot as precious trophies, but as the “soul” of a room. That matters in judging because it’s a
shortcut to authenticity. A space that includes older pieces, reupholstered finds, or meaningful objects often feels more timeless than a space that
looks like it was ordered in one late-night tab frenzy.

4) Pattern and color with a point (a.k.a. “layered, not loud for sport”)

She’s known for British-style layeringmixing pattern scales, textures, and colors in a way that feels collected. Importantly, it’s not one-note.
The best projects show a rhythm from room to room: quieter moments, bolder moments, and a cohesive story rather than a single pattern cranked to
maximum volume everywhere.

5) Practical upgrades that make the house feel more “real”

Some of the best design improvements are the unglamorous ones: thicker-looking door jambs, better storage, lighting that doesn’t feel like an
interrogation, and architectural details that make a space feel substantial. Rita has even called out thin walls as a pet peevebecause they can make
a home feel flimsy, like a set instead of a place.

A Quick Primer on the 2017 Considered Design Awards

The 2017 contest covered both interiors (Remodelista) and exteriors/gardens (Gardenista), with categories split between amateur and professional
entries in key areas.

Interior categories (Remodelista)

  • Best Bath (Amateur + Professional)
  • Best Kitchen (Amateur + Professional)
  • Best Living/Dining (Amateur + Professional)
  • Best UK Interior (Amateur + Professional)

Garden categories (Gardenista)

  • Best Landscape (Professional)
  • Best Garden (Amateur)
  • Best Outdoor Living Space (Open to all)
  • Best Curb Appeal (Open to all)
  • Best Edible Garden (Open to all)
  • Best Hardscape Project (Open to all)
  • Best UK Landscape (Professional)
  • Best UK Garden (Amateur)

The timeline mattered because it shaped how judging worked: submissions first, then a finalist selection phase with editors and judges, followed by
public voting for most categories, and then winner announcements.

How Finalists Were Chosen (and Why Your Project Story Matters)

If you’ve ever wondered why two projects that both look “pretty” can feel very different in impact, it usually comes down to decision-making.
In the 2017 awards structure, finalists were selected by editors alongside guest judgesmeaning your photos and your description mattered.

A strong submission doesn’t just show the final look. It communicates:

  • The constraint: tiny footprint, awkward layout, limited budget, historic quirks, bad light, etc.
  • The solution: what changed, and why those choices were the right ones.
  • The “considered” proof: details that show thought (storage, proportions, material choices, reuse, longevity).
  • The lived-in test: how the space performs day-to-day.

This aligns neatly with Rita Konig’s design process: function first, then layers, then personality. Or, to put it another way:
“Show me the life this room supports, not just the shopping list.”

What Would Rita Notice First in a Bathroom, Kitchen, or Living Space?

Bathrooms: the calm test

Award-worthy bathrooms usually do one of two things: they make a small space feel larger and smarter, or they make a larger space feel calmer and more
intentional. Judges tend to notice proportion mistakes quicklyvanities that overwhelm, lighting that flatters nobody, or storage that was clearly an
afterthought. The best submissions show a plan for both beauty and daily use.

Kitchens: function disguised as charm

Kitchens win when they’re efficient and inviting. That can look like better work zones, improved storage, or simply a layout that lets the
cook talk to humans instead of a wall. Rita has even talked about the idea of a “cook-in dining room”a reminder that how we gather matters just as
much as what cabinets we pick.

Living/Dining: seating is the truth serum

Living rooms reveal whether a space was designed for real life. If seating is awkward, the room will never feel rightno matter how great the rug is.
Rita’s emphasis on layout and comfort suggests she’d respond to submissions that show generous, flexible seating and zones that support how people
actually spend time (reading, lounging, entertaining, kids, pets, the whole circus).

Real-World Scale: What the 2017 Contest Looked Like

The 2017 awards drew thousands of photos and broad participation across regions. After finalists were selected, readers voted in large numbers, and
winners were announced afterward, category by category.

You don’t need to memorize the stats to appreciate the point: judges weren’t picking from five perfect projects; they were narrowing a huge pool into
a shortlist that represented the most thoughtful solutions. That’s why a “considered” narrative and clear photography matter so much.

How to Design (and Submit) Like You Want Rita Konig to Circle Your Project

Lead with the problem you solved

Don’t bury the lede. Start your description with the obstacle: “galley kitchen with no storage,” “bathroom with no natural light,” “living room that
became a hallway,” “front yard that looked like it gave up.” Then show the fix.

Photograph function, not just finishes

If the brilliance is in the layout, prove it. Include angles that show circulation and how zones connect. A judge can’t reward a clever plan they
can’t see.

Mix old and new on purpose

A room that includes vintage pieces (or older architectural cues) often reads as more personal and more durable over time. If you reused, reworked, or
reupholstered something, say so. “Considered” isn’t just a vibe; it’s evidence.

Make comfort visible

Show cushions, throws, lamps, and layers that signal livability. The goal isn’t to stage a showroom; it’s to communicate that the room supports
a real life. (Bonus: real life tends to win popularity votes, too.)

Experiences: What a Design Awards Season Feels Like (and What Rita’s Judging Lens Teaches You)

Here’s the funny thing about entering a design awards contest: you start off thinking it’s about your space, and you end up realizing it’s about your
decisions. The process has a way of turning you into a narrator of your own work. You find yourself saying sentences like, “We moved the doorway
eight inches and it changed everything,” which is both true and also the kind of line that makes your non-design friends blink twice.

A typical awards-season experience begins with photo triage. You have 10 great shots, 30 decent ones, and 400 pictures of the dog that somehow ended
up in the folder. Picking the images forces you to ask: what’s the real story here? Is it the transformation? The layout fix? The way the kitchen now
works for actual cooking instead of sad microwave living? This is where a judge like Rita Konig becomes a helpful imaginary audience, because her
design philosophy nudges you toward the “why,” not just the “what.”

Then comes the descriptionand this is where people either shine or accidentally sabotage themselves. The strongest entries read like someone calmly
explaining a smart solution to a friend: the constraints, the choices, the trade-offs. The weaker entries read like a receipt. (“We bought X, then Y,
then Z.”) Rita’s “detective work” approach reminds you that the most interesting part of a project is the life it supports. If your living room now
seats eight people without feeling cramped, say that. If your bathroom storage stopped the daily counter explosion, say that too. The unglamorous win
is still a win.

The emotional roller coaster is real, even if you pretend you’re too cool for emotions. You submit, you refresh the page, you wonder if your “before”
photo is ugly enough to be dramatic (it is), and you start noticing that the best projects all have one thing in common: they feel specific. Not
trend-specificperson-specific. That’s the Rita Konig sweet spot. Her rooms tend to feel like they belong to someone, not to an algorithm.

Finally, there’s the post-submission clarity that hits like a gentle lamp glow: you learn what you value. Maybe you realize you care more about
comfort than perfection. Maybe you realize you’re a “layout first” person now and you’ll never look at a badly placed sofa the same way again. Maybe
you become the friend who notices thin walls and mutters, “We can fix that with a deeper jamb,” at open houses. Congratulations. You have joined the
club. Membership includes strong opinions about lighting and an inability to ignore a poorly hung picture frame.

Conclusion

Being a 2017 Awards Judge wasn’t just a title for Rita Konigit was a role that fit her strengths: evaluating design as a blend of
feeling, function, and personality. The Considered Design Awards celebrated projects that solved real problems with thoughtful choices, and her own
public “rules” (start with layout, prioritize comfort, mix vintage in, balance pattern, and make it yours) map almost perfectly onto what makes an
entry stand out.

Even if you never enter an awards contest, you can borrow the judge mindset: tell the truth about how you live, design for that truth, and then layer
in the beauty. The best rooms don’t just photograph wellthey hold up on a random Tuesday when you’re tired, hungry, and sitting exactly where the
layout intended you to sit.

The post 2017 Awards Judge: Rita Konig appeared first on Everyday Software, Everyday Joy.

]]>
https://business-service.2software.net/2017-awards-judge-rita-konig/feed/0